On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 17:21 +0800, chenxiaolong wrote:
> According to your suggestion, the check of the built-in function was
> modifiedin the simd_correctness_check.h file, and the types of the actual
> parameters
> of the built-in function were inconsistent with those of the formal
> parameters.
> The problems with the GCC regression test are as follows:
>
> ...
> note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type '__m128i'
> error: incompatible type for argument 3 of 'ASSERTEQ_64'
> ...
>
> The reason is that the types used in __m{128i,128,128d} are defined in
> the vector header file (lsxintrin.h or lasxintrin.h), and their basic
> types do not match the parameter types corresponding to the functions.
Ouch. I forgot that we are passing vectors themselves to ASSERTEQ_64,
not the pointers.
Now I come up with this:
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstring>
#include <cstdlib>
static inline void
dump (const void *_ptr, int size, const char *name)
{
const char *ptr = (const char *)_ptr;
printf("%s:", name);
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++)
printf(" %02hhx", ptr[i]);
putchar('\n');
}
template <class U, class V>
static inline void
assert_eq (const U &res, const V &ref, int line)
{
static_assert(sizeof (res) == sizeof (ref));
if (!memcmp (&res, &ref, sizeof(ref)))
return;
dump (res, sizeof (res), "res");
dump (ref, sizeof (ref), "ref");
}
int main()
{
float x[4] = {};
int y[4] = {};
assert_eq(x, y, __LINE__);
}
This is C++, not C. But IMO we can port the tests to C++ anyway.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
