> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:09:10 +0100
Richard B.:
> > > In the end we might need to move/duplicate the test to some
> > > gcc.target/* dir and restrict it to a specific tuning.
>
> I intend to post two alternative patches to get this
> resolved:
> 1: Move the tests to gcc.target/i386/scev-[3-5].c
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] testsuite: Fix XPASS for gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c, -4.c
and -5.c [PR112786]
This is the first alternative, perhaps the more appropriate one.
Tested cris-elf, arm-eabi (default), x86_64-linux, ditto -m32,
h8300-elf and shle-linux; xpassing, skipped and passing as
applicable and intended.
Ok to commit?
-- >8 --
PR testsuite/112786
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c,
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c: Revert last change and move...
* gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c, gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c:
gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c: ...here.
---
gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-3.c | 3 +--
gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-4.c | 3 +--
gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-5.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-3.c (80%)
rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-4.c (81%)
rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-5.c (81%)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c
similarity index 80%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c
index beea9aed9fe9..ac8c8d4519e3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c
@@ -40,5 +40,4 @@ __BB(6):
}
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c
similarity index 81%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c
index a97f75f81f65..b0d594053019 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c
@@ -45,5 +45,4 @@ __BB(6):
}
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c
similarity index 81%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c
index 08f4260403c4..c911a9298866 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c
@@ -40,5 +40,4 @@ __BB(6):
}
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */
--
2.30.2
