The 11/10/2023 12:22, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This test looks like it intends to pass a small struct argument
> through both a non-variadic and variadic argument, but due to
> the typo, it does not achieve that.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
> 
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/ice_1.c (foo): Call named.


FWIW, this looks good to me.
(but i cannot approve patches)

> 
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/ice_1.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/ice_1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/ice_1.c
> index 906ccebf616..edc35db2f6e 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/ice_1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/ice_1.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ void unnamed (int, ...);
>  
>  void foo ()
>  {
> -  name (0, aaaa);
> +  named (0, aaaa);
>    unnamed (0, aaaa);
>  }
> 
> base-commit: 5f6c5fe078c45bc32c8d21da6b14c27c0ed7be6e
> 

Reply via email to