Thanks! Committed!

David Faust writes:

> Hi Cupertino,
>
> On 11/27/23 09:21, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> David: Thanks for the v1 review.
>>
>> This version adds the following;
>>  - test case,
>>  - improves condition logic,
>>  - fixes mask typo.
>>
>> Looking forward to your review.
>
> v2 LGTM, please apply.
> Thanks!
>
>>
>> v1 at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636391.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Cupertino
>>
>>
>> 0004-Fixed-problem-with-BTF-defining-smaller-enums.patch
>>
>> commit 3f89d352a4ee90882089142d743f8a748013b5fe
>> Author: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.mira...@oracle.com>
>> Date:   Fri Nov 10 14:02:30 2023 +0000
>>
>>     Fixed problem with BTF defining smaller enums.
>>
>>     This patch fixes a BTF, which would become invalid when having
>>     smaller then 4 byte definitions of enums.
>>     For example, when using the __attribute__((mode(byte))) in the enum
>>     definition.
>>
>>     Two problems were identified:
>>      - it would incorrectly create an entry for enum64 when the size of the
>>        enum was different then 4.
>>      - it would allocate less then 4 bytes for the value entry in BTF, in
>>        case the type was smaller.
>>
>>     BTF generated was validated against clang.
>>
>>     gcc/ChangeLog:
>>             * bpfout.cc (btf_calc_num_vbytes): Fixed logic for enum64.
>>             (btf_asm_enum_const): Corrected logic for enum64 and smaller
>>             than 4 bytes values.
>>
>>     gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>             gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-enum-small.c: Added test.
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/btfout.cc b/gcc/btfout.cc
>> index e07fed302c24..5f2e99ce4725 100644
>> --- a/gcc/btfout.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/btfout.cc
>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ btf_calc_num_vbytes (ctf_dtdef_ref dtd)
>>        break;
>>
>>      case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
>> -      vlen_bytes += (dtd->dtd_data.ctti_size == 0x8)
>> +      vlen_bytes += (dtd->dtd_data.ctti_size > 4)
>>                      ? vlen * sizeof (struct btf_enum64)
>>                      : vlen * sizeof (struct btf_enum);
>>        break;
>> @@ -914,8 +914,8 @@ btf_asm_enum_const (unsigned int size, ctf_dmdef_t * 
>> dmd, unsigned int idx)
>>  {
>>    dw2_asm_output_data (4, dmd->dmd_name_offset, "ENUM_CONST '%s' idx=%u",
>>                     dmd->dmd_name, idx);
>> -  if (size == 4)
>> -    dw2_asm_output_data (size, dmd->dmd_value, "bte_value");
>> +  if (size <= 4)
>> +    dw2_asm_output_data (size < 4 ? 4 : size, dmd->dmd_value, "bte_value");
>>    else
>>      {
>>        dw2_asm_output_data (4, dmd->dmd_value & 0xffffffff, 
>> "bte_value_lo32");
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-enum-small.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-enum-small.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..eb8a1bd2c438
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-enum-small.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
>> +/* Test BTF generation for small enums.  */
>> +
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -gbtf -dA" } */
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bte_value_lo32" } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bte_value_hi32" } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x6000002\[\t 
>> \]+\[^\n\]*btt_info" 1 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " ENUM_CONST 'eSMALL' idx=0" 1 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " ENUM_CONST 'eSMALLY' idx=1" 1 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"eSMALL.0\"\[\t 
>> \]+\[^\n\]*btf_string" 1 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"eSMALLY.0\"\[\t 
>> \]+\[^\n\]*btf_string" 1 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "bte_value" 2 } } */
>> +
>> +enum smalled_enum
>> +{
>> +  eSMALL,
>> +  eSMALLY,
>> +} __attribute__((mode(byte)));
>> +
>> +struct root_struct {
>> +  enum smalled_enum esmall;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum smalled_enum
>> +foo(struct root_struct *root) {
>> +  return root->esmall;
>> +}
>>

Reply via email to