On Wednesday 23 May 2012 04:17:51 Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > [...] > > > This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for a release > > > branch. > > > > > > R. > > > > There was agreement by all pushing for the change to use it. So, let's > > ask the release managers about their opinion, > > I'm ok with the change - but of course only to carry one less patch > in our local tree. What do others think? It would definitely (anyway) > need documenting in changes.html (for both 4.7.1 and 4.8).
i've done this for Gentoo and 4.5.0+, so if all the distros are going to be doing this in 4.7.x anyways, makes sense to me to do it in the official branch. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
