On 11/13/23 06:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
There is a missed opportunity here to issue spelling diagnostics
in prototype declarations (e.g., for “extern int foo (int32t);”).
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Document changes.
gcc/c/
* c-decl.cc (warn_defaults_to): Call emit_diagnostic_valist
instead of reimplementing it. Issue a pedpermerror for C99
and later.
(store_parm_decls_oldstyle): Call pedpermerror for
OPT_Wimplicit_int.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/Wimplicit-int-1.c: Compile with -fpermissive due to
expected warning.
* gcc.dg/Wimplicit-int-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/Wimplicit-int-1a.c: New test. Copied from
gcc.dg/Wimplicit-int-1.c, but expect errors.
* gcc.dg/Wimplicit-int-4a.c: New test. Copied from
gcc.dg/Wimplicit-int-4.c, but expect errors.
* gcc.dg/gnu23-attr-syntax-2.c: Compile with -fpermissive
due to expected implicit-int error.
* gcc.dg/gnu23-attr-syntax-3.c: New test. Copied from
gcc.dg/gnu23-attr-syntax-2.c, but expect an error.
* gcc.dg/pr105635.c: Build with -fpermissive due to implicit
int.
* gcc.dg/pr105635-2.c: New test. Copied from
gcc.dg/pr105635.c. Expect implicit int error.
* gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758.c: Build with -fpermissive due to
implicit int.
* gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758-2.c: New test. Copied from
gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758.c. Expect implicit int error.
---
OK
jeff
