> Am 08.11.2023 um 10:04 schrieb Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com>:
>
> * Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches:
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/setjmp-7.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/setjmp-7.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..44b5bcbfa
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/setjmp-7.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -w" } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target indirect_jumps } */
>> +
>> +struct __jmp_buf_tag { };
>> +typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag jmp_buf[1];
>> +struct globals { jmp_buf listingbuf; };
>> +extern struct globals *const ptr_to_globals;
>> +void foo()
>> +{
>> + if ( _setjmp ( ((*ptr_to_globals).listingbuf )))
>> + ;
>> +}
>
> Is the implicit declaration of _setjmp important to this test?
> Could we declare it explicitly instead?
It shouldn’t be important.
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
