Hi,

Gentle ping this series:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607146.html

BR,
Kewen

>>>>> on 2022/11/24 17:15, Kewen Lin wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following Segher's suggestion, this patch series is to rework
>>>>>> function rs6000_emit_vector_compare for vector float and int
>>>>>> in multiple steps, it's based on the previous attempts [1][2].
>>>>>> As mentioned in [1], the need to rework this for float is to
>>>>>> make a centralized place for vector float comparison handlings
>>>>>> instead of supporting with swapping ops and reversing code etc.
>>>>>> dispersedly.  It's also for a subsequent patch to handle
>>>>>> comparison operators with or without trapping math (PR105480).
>>>>>> With the handling on vector float reworked, we can further make
>>>>>> the handling on vector int simplified as shown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For Segher's concern about whether this rework causes any
>>>>>> assembly change, I constructed two testcases for vector float[3]
>>>>>> and int[4] respectively before, it showed the most are fine
>>>>>> excepting for the difference on LE and UNGT, it's demonstrated
>>>>>> as improvement since it uses GE instead of GT ior EQ.  The
>>>>>> associated test case in patch 3/9 is a good example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Besides, w/ and w/o the whole patch series, I built the whole
>>>>>> SPEC2017 at options -O3 and -Ofast separately, checked the
>>>>>> differences on object assembly.  The result showed that the
>>>>>> most are unchanged, except for:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   * at -O3, 521.wrf_r has 9 object files and 526.blender_r has
>>>>>>     9 object files with differences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   * at -Ofast, 521.wrf_r has 12 object files, 526.blender_r has
>>>>>>     one and 527.cam4_r has 4 object files with differences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By looking into these differences, all significant differences
>>>>>> are caused by the known improvement mentined above transforming
>>>>>> GT ior EQ to GE, which can also affect unrolling decision due
>>>>>> to insn count.  Some other trivial differences are branch
>>>>>> target offset difference, nop difference for alignment, vsx
>>>>>> register number differences etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also evaluated the runtime performance for these changed
>>>>>> benchmarks, the result is neutral.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These patches are bootstrapped and regress-tested
>>>>>> incrementally on powerpc64-linux-gnu P7 & P8, and
>>>>>> powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 & P10.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it ok for trunk?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BR,
>>>>>> Kewen
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606375.html
>>>>>> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606376.html
>>>>>> [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606504.html
>>>>>> [4] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606506.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kewen Lin (9):
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector float comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare - 
>>>>>> p1
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector float comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare - 
>>>>>> p2
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector float comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare - 
>>>>>> p3
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector float comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare - 
>>>>>> p4
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector integer comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare 
>>>>>> - p1
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector integer comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare 
>>>>>> - p2
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector integer comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare 
>>>>>> - p3
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector integer comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare 
>>>>>> - p4
>>>>>>   rs6000: Rework vector integer comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare 
>>>>>> - p5
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc                 | 180 ++++++--------------
>>>>>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vcond-fp.c |  25 +++
>>>>>>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
>>>>>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vcond-fp.c
>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to