On 10/12/23 12:28, Kito Cheng wrote:
It wouldn't be a bad idea to bring more stability, particularly to tests which are expecting instructions in a specific order. THat feels like it's likely a distinct change though.Sorry for the late comment after Jeff say ok, but I guess we may consider add "-fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2" to avoid disturbing from schedule like some of our test case in gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv?
jeff
