Hi,

"Kewen.Lin" <li...@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Hi Jeff,
>
> on 2023/8/30 15:43, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> As mentioned in PR108338, on p9, we could use mtvsrws to implement
>> the bitcast from SI to SF (or lowpart DI to SF).
>> 
>> For code:
>>   *(long long*)buff = di;
>>   float f = *(float*)(buff);
>> 
>> "sldi 9,3,32 ; mtvsrd 1,9 ; xscvspdpn 1,1" is generated.
>> A better one would be "mtvsrws 1,3 ; xscvspdpn 1,1".
>> 
>> Compare with previous patch:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/623533.html
>> "highpart DI-->SF" is put to a seperate patch.
>> 
>> Pass bootstrap and regression on ppc64{,le}.
>> Is this ok for trunk?
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jeff (Jiufu Guo)
>> 
> Nit: Missing a PR marker line.
Ok, this patch would share the PR108338.
>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>> 
>>      * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (movsf_from_si): Update to generate mtvsrws
>>      for P9.
>> 
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> 
>>      * gcc.target/powerpc/pr108338.c: Updated to check mtvsrws for p9.
>> 
>> ---
>>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md                 | 25 ++++++++++++++++-----
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108338.c |  6 +++--
>>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
>> index 
>> 8c92cbf976de915136ad5dba24e69a363d21438d..c03e677bca79e8fb1acb276d07d0acfae009f6d8
>>  100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
>> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
>> @@ -8280,13 +8280,26 @@ (define_insn_and_split "movsf_from_si"
>>  {
>>    rtx op0 = operands[0];
>>    rtx op1 = operands[1];
>> -  rtx op2 = operands[2];
>> -  rtx op1_di = gen_rtx_REG (DImode, REGNO (op1));
>> 
>> -  /* Move SF value to upper 32-bits for xscvspdpn.  */
>> -  emit_insn (gen_ashldi3 (op2, op1_di, GEN_INT (32)));
>> -  emit_insn (gen_p8_mtvsrd_sf (op0, op2));
>> -  emit_insn (gen_vsx_xscvspdpn_directmove (op0, op0));
>> +  /* Move lowpart 32-bits from register for SFmode.  */
>> +  if (TARGET_P9_VECTOR)
>> +    {
>> +      /* Using mtvsrws;xscvspdpn.  */
>> +      rtx op0_v = gen_rtx_REG (V4SImode, REGNO (op0));
>> +      emit_insn (gen_vsx_splat_v4si (op0_v, op1));
>> +      emit_insn (gen_vsx_xscvspdpn_directmove (op0, op0));
>> +    }
>> +  else
>> +    {
>> +      rtx op2 = operands[2];
>> +      rtx op1_di = gen_rtx_REG (DImode, REGNO (op1));
>> +
>> +      /* Using ashl;mtvsrd;xscvspdpn.  */
>
> Nit: Use sldi instead of ashl as the others are actual
> mnemonics but ashl isn't.
Oh, yes, thanks for your insight review!
>
>> +      emit_insn (gen_ashldi3 (op2, op1_di, GEN_INT (32)));
>> +      emit_insn (gen_p8_mtvsrd_sf (op0, op2));
>> +      emit_insn (gen_vsx_xscvspdpn_directmove (op0, op0));
>> +    }
>> +
>>    DONE;
>>  }
>>    [(set_attr "length"
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108338.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108338.c
>> index 
>> 6db65595343c2407fc32f68f5f52a1f7196c371d..0565e5254ed0a8cc579cf505a3f865426dcf62ae
>>  100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108338.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108338.c
>> @@ -19,9 +19,11 @@ float  __attribute__ ((noipa)) sf_from_di_off4 (long long 
>> l)
>> 
>>  /* Under lp64, parameter 'l' is in one DI reg, then bitcast sub DI to SF. */
>>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxscvspdpn\M} 2 { target { lp64 && 
>> has_arch_pwr8 } } } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mmtvsrd\M} 2 { target { lp64 && 
>> has_arch_pwr8 } } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mmtvsrd\M} 2 { target { lp64 && { 
>> has_arch_pwr8 && { ! has_arch_pwr9 } } } } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\msldi\M} 1 { target { lp64 && { 
>> has_arch_pwr8 && { ! has_arch_pwr9 } } } } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mmtvsrd\M} 1 { target { lp64 && 
>> has_arch_pwr9 } } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mmtvsrws\M} 1 { target { lp64 && 
>> has_arch_pwr9 } } } } */
>>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldicr\M} 1 { target { lp64 && 
>> has_arch_pwr8 } } } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\msldi\M} 1 { target { lp64 && 
>> has_arch_pwr8 } } } } */
>> 
>
> This part might need a fresh as the comments to patch 1/2.
Yes, thanks!
>
> The others look good to me, thanks!

BR,
Jeff (Jiufu Guo)
>
> BR,
> Kewen

Reply via email to