Committed, thanks Juzhe.

On 2023/9/18 20:30, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
LGTM

------------------------------------------------------------------------
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai

    *From:* Lehua Ding <mailto:lehua.d...@rivai.ai>
    *Date:* 2023-09-18 20:29
    *To:* gcc-patches <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
    *CC:* juzhe.zhong <mailto:juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>; kito.cheng
    <mailto:kito.ch...@gmail.com>; rdapp.gcc
    <mailto:rdapp....@gmail.com>; palmer <mailto:pal...@rivosinc.com>;
    jeffreyalaw <mailto:jeffreya...@gmail.com>; lehua.ding
    <mailto:lehua.d...@rivai.ai>
    *Subject:* [PATCH] RISC-V: Removed misleading comments in testcases
    This patch removed the misleading comments in testcases since we
    support fold min(int, poly) to constant by this patch
    (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/629651.html).
    Thereby the csrr will not appear inside the assembly code, even if there
    is no support for some VLS vector patterns.
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c: Removed comments.
    * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c: Ditto.
    ---
    gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c   | 1 -
    gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c | 1 -
    2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
    diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c
    b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c
    index 40224c69458..e36fa9decfd 100644
    --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c
    +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/div-1.c
    @@ -54,5 +54,4 @@ DEF_OP_VV (div, 256, int64_t, /)
    DEF_OP_VV (div, 512, int64_t, /)
    /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times
    {vdivu?\.vv\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+} 42 } } */
    -/* TODO: Ideally, we should make sure there is no "csrr vlenb".
    However, we still have 'csrr vlenb' for some cases since we don't
    support VLS mode conversion which are needed by division.  */
    /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {csrr} } } */
    diff --git
    a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c
    b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c
    index b34a349949b..db2295b2dd6 100644
    --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c
    +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls/shift-3.c
    @@ -54,5 +54,4 @@ DEF_OP_VV (shift, 256, int64_t, <<)
    DEF_OP_VV (shift, 512, int64_t, <<)
    /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times
    {vsll\.vv\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+} 41 } } */
    -/* TODO: Ideally, we should make sure there is no "csrr vlenb".
    However, we still have 'csrr vlenb' for some cases since we don't
    support VLS mode conversion which are needed by division.  */
    /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {csrr} } } */
    --
    2.36.3


--
Best,
Lehua

Reply via email to