Hi!

Recent match.pd changes trigger ICE in build_minus_one_cst, apparently
I forgot to handle BITINT_TYPE in these (while I've handled it in
build_zero_cst).

Will commit as obvious together with the rest of the series when the last
patches are approved.

2023-09-05  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c/102989
        * tree.cc (build_one_cst, build_minus_one_cst): Handle BITINT_TYPE
        like INTEGER_TYPE.

--- gcc/tree.cc.jj      2023-09-04 09:45:33.444059843 +0200
+++ gcc/tree.cc 2023-09-05 08:57:31.420059962 +0200
@@ -2546,7 +2546,7 @@ build_one_cst (tree type)
     {
     case INTEGER_TYPE: case ENUMERAL_TYPE: case BOOLEAN_TYPE:
     case POINTER_TYPE: case REFERENCE_TYPE:
-    case OFFSET_TYPE:
+    case OFFSET_TYPE: case BITINT_TYPE:
       return build_int_cst (type, 1);
 
     case REAL_TYPE:
@@ -2599,7 +2599,7 @@ build_minus_one_cst (tree type)
     {
     case INTEGER_TYPE: case ENUMERAL_TYPE: case BOOLEAN_TYPE:
     case POINTER_TYPE: case REFERENCE_TYPE:
-    case OFFSET_TYPE:
+    case OFFSET_TYPE: case BITINT_TYPE:
       return build_int_cst (type, -1);
 
     case REAL_TYPE:

        Jakub

Reply via email to