On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 11:52 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 04:21, David Malcolm <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 11:01 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 18:15, David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> > > > Pushed to trunk as r14-3481-g99a3fcb8ff0bf2.
> > > Hi David,
> > > It seems the new tests FAIL on arm for LTO bootstrap config:
> > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap_lto-build/263/artifact/artifacts/06-check_regression/fails.sum/*view*/
> >
> > Sorry about this.
> >
> > Looking at e.g. the console.log.xz, I just see the status of the
> > failing tests.
> >
> > Is there an easy way to get at the stderr from the tests without
> > rerunning this?
> >
> > Otherwise, I'd appreciate help with reproducing this.
> Hi David,
> I have attached make check log for the failing tests.
> To reproduce, I configured and built gcc with following options on
> armv8 machine:
> ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-float=hard
> --with-fpu=neon-fp-armv8 --with-mode=thumb --with-arch=armv8-a
> --disable-werror --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
> make -j$(nproc)
Thanks.
Looks a lot like PR analyzer/110483, which I'm working on now (sorry!)
What's the endianness of the host?
Specifically, the pertinent part of the log is:
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-17.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
┌─────┬─────┬────┬────┬────┐┌─────┬─────┬─────┐
│ [1] │ [1] │[1] │[1] │[1] ││ [1] │ [1] │ [1] │
├─────┼─────┼────┼────┼────┤├─────┼─────┼─────┤
│ ' ' │ 'w' │'o' │'r' │'l' ││ 'd' │ '!' │ NUL │
├─────┴─────┴────┴────┴────┴┴─────┴─────┴─────┤
│ string literal (type: 'char[8]') │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
v v v v v v v v
┌─────┬────────────────────────────────────────┬────┐┌─────────────────┐
│ [0] │ ... │[9] ││ │
├─────┴────────────────────────────────────────┴────┤│after valid range│
│ 'buf' (type: 'char[10]') ││ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────┘└─────────────────┘
├─────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────┤├────────┬────────┤
│ │
╭─────────┴────────╮ ╭─────────┴─────────╮
│capacity: 10 bytes│ │overflow of 3 bytes│
╰──────────────────╯ ╰───────────────────╯
where the issue seems to be all those [1], which are meant to be index
[0], [1], [2], etc.
Dave
