Yes, the other files are in another committee proposal, and I'm working my
way through the proposals one by one.
Thank you for the feedback, I'll update and resend
/Paul

Den ons. 16. aug. 2023 kl. 15.51 skrev Arsen Arsenović <ar...@aarsen.me>:

>
> Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 22:23, Paul M. Bendixen via Libstdc++
> > <libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> P1642 includes the header cstdarg to the freestanding implementation.
> >> This was probably left out by accident, this patch puts it in.
> >> Since this is one of the headers that go in whole cloth, there should
> be no
> >> further actions needed.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. I agree that <cstdarg> should be freestanding,
> > but I think <cstdalign> and <cstdbool> were also missed from the
> > change. Arsen?
>
> Indeed, we should include all three, and according to [compliance],
> there's a couple more headers that we should provide (cwchar, cstring,
> cerrno, and cmath, but these are probably significantly more involved,
> so we can handle them separately).
>
> As guessed, the omission was not intentional.
>
> If you could, add those two to the patch as well, edit Makefile.am and
> regenerate using automake 1.15.1, and see
> https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html wrt. changelogs in commit messages.
>
> Thank you!  Have a lovely day :-)
>
> [compliance]: https://eel.is/c++draft/compliance
>
> > Also, the patch should change include/Makefile.am as well (the .in
> > file is autogenerated from that one).
> >
> >
> >> This might be related to PR106953, but since that one touches the
> partial
> >> headers I'm not sure
>
> The headers mentioned in this PR are provided in freestanding,
> partially, in 13 already, indeed.
>
> >> /Paul M. Bendixen
> >>
> >> --
> >> • − − •/• −/• • −/• − • •/− • • •/•/− •/− • •/• •/− • • −/•/− •/• − − •−
> >> •/− − •/− −/• −/• •/• − • •/• − • − • −/− • − •/− − −/− −//
>
>
> --
> Arsen Arsenović
>


-- 
• − − •/• −/• • −/• − • •/− • • •/•/− •/− • •/• •/− • • −/•/− •/• − − •−
•/− − •/− −/• −/• •/• − • •/• − • − • −/− • − •/− − −/− −//

Reply via email to