On 8/14/23 14:33, Edwin Lu wrote:
On 8/11/2023 6:29 AM, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 8/10/23 21:45, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
This seems pretty mechinacial: just scrub through our MDs to check
for any un-typed insns, then add the assert and fix the failures.
You're more than welcome to have at it, but LMK if you want me to try
and find some time for someone to do it -- certainly seems like a
good way for someone new to dig in a bit.
Yes, definitely mechanical. And yes, it's a good way for someone to
start to get familiar with these bits -- I used the lack of types on
some of the bitmanip insns to help ramp up Raphael and one of the RAU
guys in this space.
Jeff
Hi, Palmer sent me this thread to take a look at. I can start working on
this.
Sounds good. The goal is to make sure that every insn has a type and
once we hit that milestone we can enable the currently #if 0'd assert in
riscv_sched_variable_issue to help ensure we don't introduce any new
insns without types in the future.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to reach out.
jeff
