On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > It's also something I kept meaning to resolve and your submission just gave me > the proper motivation to move zicond forward. The target specific bits you > did lined up perfectly with the community feedback on the original VRULL > implementation as well as the direction Ventana had taken on our internal > tree.
I wonder however why do we need so much more code, including the middle end too, to support this ISA extension than we do for the very same set of MIPSr6 instructions under ISA_HAS_SEL, hmm... Maciej
