On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > When I moved the first bits of the switch lowering code from stmt.c, I > didn't anticipate that the GIMPLE passes can sometimes perform > transformations that break the rules the gimplifier uses while > lowering SWITCH_EXPRs. > > The attached patch adds the expected rules to the GIMPLE_SWITCH verifier. > > Bootstrap&test running on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK if it passes?
Ok! Thanks, Richard. > Ciao! > Steven
