On 02/05/2012 21:22, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> PING #2
> 
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Janne Blomqvist
> <blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> PING!
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 00:46, Janne Blomqvist
>> <blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the attached patch implements a few fixes and cleanups for the MOD and
>>> MODULO intrinsics.
>>>
>>> - When the arguments are constant, use mpfr_fmod instead of the naive
>>> algorithms which are numerically unstable for large arguments. This
>>> extends the PR 24518 fix to constant arguments as well, and makes the
>>> compile-time evaluation match the runtime implementation which also
>>> uses fmod in the same manner.
>>>
>>> - Remove the old fallback path for the case builtin_fmod is not
>>> available, as the builtin is AFAICS always available.
>>>
>>> - Specify the behavior wrt. the sign and magnitude of the result,
>>> mention this in the documentation. This includes signed zeros which
>>> now behave similar to other finite values. I.e. for MOD(A, P) the
>>> result has the sign of A and a magnitude less than that of P, and for
>>> MODULO(A, P) the result has the sign of P and a magnitude less than
>>> that of P. As a (minor?) caveat, at runtime this depends on the
>>> implementation of the fmod function in the target C library. But, a
>>> fmod that follows C99 Annex F implements this behavior.
>>>
>>> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, Ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> 2012-04-19  Janne Blomqvist  <j...@gcc.gnu.org>
>>>
>>>        PR fortran/49010
>>>        PR fortran/24518
>>>        * intrinsic.texi (MOD, MODULO): Mention sign and magnitude of result.
>>>        * simplify.c (gfc_simplify_mod): Use mpfr_fmod.
>>>        (gfc_simplify_modulo): Likewise, use copysign to fix the result if
>>>        zero.
>>>        * trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_mod): Remove fallback as
>>>        builtin_fmod is always available. For modulo, call copysign to fix
>>>        the result when signed zeros are enabled.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Janne Blomqvist
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Janne Blomqvist
> 
> 
> 

Hello,

this looks good. OK with a testcase.
Thanks, and sorry for the delay.

Mikael

Reply via email to