Errr, sorry about this ping.  I was meant to re-ping my IPA patches
after 7 days, but just realized it had been only 4.  My bad.

Aldy

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:22 AM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> PING*3
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:49 AM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ping*2
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 14:11 Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> PING
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:30 PM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 5/29/23 16:51, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, May 22 2023, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> > >> Implement hashing for ipa_vr.  When all is said and done, all these
> >> > >> patches incurr a 7.64% slowdown for ipa-cp, with is entirely covered 
> >> > >> by
> >> > >> the similar 7% increase in this area last week.  So we get type 
> >> > >> agnostic
> >> > >> ranges with "infinite" range precision close to free.
> >> > >
> >> > > Do you know why/where this slow-down happens?  Do we perhaps want to
> >> > > limit the "infiniteness" a little somehow?
> >> >
> >> > I addressed the slow down in another mail.
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, jump functions live for a long time, have you looked at how 
> >> > > memory
> >> > > hungry they become?  I hope that the hashing would be good at 
> >> > > preventing
> >> > > any issues.
> >> >
> >> > On a side-note, the caching does help.  On a (mistaken) hunch, I had
> >> > played around with removing caching for everything but UNDEFINED/VARYING
> >> > and zero/nonzero to simplify things, but the cache hit ratio was still
> >> > surprisingly high (+80%).  So good job there :-).
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Generally, I think I OK with the patches if the impact on memory is not
> >> > > too bad, though I guess they depend on the one I looked at last week, 
> >> > > so
> >> > > we may focus on that one first.
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure whether this was an OK for the other patches, given you
> >> > approved the first patch, so I'll hold off until you give the go-ahead.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> > Aldy

Reply via email to