From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com>
Date: Friday, May 19, 2023 at 3:20 PM
To: Tejas Belagod <tejas.bela...@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PR96339] AArch64: Optimise svlast[ab]
Tejas Belagod <tejas.bela...@arm.com> writes:
> Am I correct to understand that we still need to check for the case when
> there's a repeating non-zero elements in the case of NELTS_PER_PATTERN == 2?
> eg. { 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,....} which should be encoded as {0, 0, 1, 1} with
> NPATTERNS = 2 ?

Yeah, that's right.  The current handling for NPATTERNS==2 looked
good to me.  It was the other two cases that I was worried about.

Thanks,
Richard

Thanks for all the reviews. I’ve posted a new version of the patch here - 
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/621310.html

Thanks,
Tejas.

Reply via email to