Could you use something like *[a-x0-9]+ for those operands to prevent
us hitting that issue again?
Ref: 
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-136.c#L9

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:18 PM <shiyul...@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> From: yulong <shiyul...@iscas.ac.cn>
>
> I find fail of the xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c test case and provide the 
> way to solve it.
> In this patch, I modify the check information of the 
> function(ConEmv_imm_imm_reg and ConNmv_imm_imm_reg) body.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c:Modify
>
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c
> index 99956f8496c..dda0f902c32 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int ConEmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){
>
>  /*
>  **ConEmv_imm_reg_reg:
> -**     addi    a0,a0,-1000
> +**     addi    a5,a0,-1000
>  **     th.mveqz        a2,a1,a5
>  **     mv      a0,a2
>  **     ret
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int ConNmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){
>
>  /*
>  **ConNmv_imm_reg_reg:
> -**     addi    a5,a0,-1000
> +**     addi    a0,a0,-1000
>  **     th.mvnez        a2,a1,a0
>  **     mv      a0,a2
>  **     ret
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Reply via email to