On the check for verbose==2, should that be verbose >= 2 ?
paul
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 6:38 AM, Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> genmatch currently outputs commented out line directives that have no effect
> but the compiler still has to parse only to discard.
>
> They are however handy when debugging genmatch output. As such this moves
> them
> behind the -vv flag.
>
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
>
> Ok for master?
>
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR bootstrap/84402
> * genmatch.cc (output_line_directive): Only emit commented directive
> when -vv.
> (main): Initialize verbose.
>
> --- inline copy of patch --
> diff --git a/gcc/genmatch.cc b/gcc/genmatch.cc
> index
> 638606b2502f640e59527fc5a0b23fa3bedd0cee..6d62cdea2082d92e5ecc1102c80205115a4e3040
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/genmatch.cc
> +++ b/gcc/genmatch.cc
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ output_line_directive (FILE *f, location_t location,
> else
> fprintf (f, "%s:%d", file, loc.line);
> }
> - else
> + else if (verbose == 2)
> /* Other gen programs really output line directives here, at least for
> development it's right now more convenient to have line information
> from the generated file. Still keep the directives as comment for now
> @@ -5221,6 +5221,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> return 1;
>
> bool gimple = true;
> + verbose = 0;
> char *input = argv[argc-1];
> for (int i = 1; i < argc - 1; ++i)
> {
>
>
>
>
> --
> <rb17227.patch>
