> The defined predicate of vector_move_operand composes of (non-imm || (const 
> vector && (reload_completed ? constraint_vi (op) : constraint_wc0(op))).
I may not quit understand why we group them together and named as vector_move.

I forgot the detail reason about that, but vaguely remember that is
for optimization, maybe need Ju-Zhe back and tell us the reason :P

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:06 AM Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Kito for the better approach. It works well with the prepared test 
> cases but I may have one question about the semantics of the 
> vector_move_operand.
>
> The defined predicate of vector_move_operand composes of (non-imm || (const 
> vector && (reload_completed ? constraint_vi (op) : constraint_wc0(op))).
> I may not quit understand why we group them together and named as vector_move.
>
> Another difference is that it will act on combine pass which is more generic 
> than the PATCH v1 (which acts on split2 pass).
>
> Pan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@sifive.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 11:00 PM
> To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang 
> <yanzhang.w...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Allow RVV VMS{Compare}(V1, V1) simplify to VMCLR
>
> > Could you try something like this? that should be more generic:
> >
> > (define_split
> >  [(set (match_operand:VB 0 "register_operand")
> >        (if_then_else:VB
> >          (unspec:VB
> >            [(match_operand:VB 1 "vector_all_trues_mask_operand")
> >             (match_operand 4 "vector_length_operand")
> >             (match_operand 5 "const_int_operand")
> >             (match_operand 6 "const_int_operand")
> >             (reg:SI VL_REGNUM)
> >             (reg:SI VTYPE_REGNUM)] UNSPEC_VPREDICATE)
> >          (match_operand:VB 3 "vector_move_operand")
> >          (match_operand:VB 2 "vector_undef_operand")))]
> > "TARGET_VECTOR && reload_completed"
>
> Remove the reload_completed should work well, but you might need more test, I 
> didn't run full test on this change :P
>
> >  [(const_int 0)]
> >  {
> >    emit_insn (gen_pred_mov (<MODE>mode, operands[0], CONST1_RTX 
> > (<MODE>mode),
> >                             RVV_VUNDEF (<MODE>mode), CONST0_RTX 
> > (<MODE>mode),
> >                             operands[4], operands[5]));
> >    DONE;
> >  }
> > )

Reply via email to