On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 April 2012 22:09, Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@integrable-solutions.net> > wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 04/22/2012 02:42 PM, Manuel López-Ibáńez wrote: >>>> >>>> Which seems to suggest that we add an option name for each pedwarn >>>> enabled by default. Is this also what you suggest? >>> >>> >>> I agree with this, and I think that's also what Gaby was suggesting by >>> "finer-grained". >> >> Indeed. > > Fine, this makes sense to me. I opened PR c/53075 to track this. > However, adding one option for each pedwarn is a huge task that seems > unlikely to be ever completed.
Hmm, I do not think we really need additional option set separately from the existing non-generic OPT_Wxxx.
