Am Mittwoch, dem 12.04.2023 um 00:32 +0000 schrieb Joseph Myers: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023, Martin Uecker via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > Ok, here is another attempt on fixing issues with size expression. > > Not all are regressions, but it does not make sense to try to split > > it up. > > This wording implies this is version 2 or later of the patch, could you > please give a reference to whatever previous patch posting / discussion > there may have been?
The previous one was the following for PR107557 and PR108423. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611562.html While revising it I realized that recursing for parameter when gimplifying is incorrect for the same reason as recursing in other cases (see the comment in gimplify_type_sizes). This lead to PR109450. > > > Fix ICEs related to VM types in C [PR106465, PR107557, PR108424, > > PR109450] > > 108424 seems to be the wrong PR number. This should be: PR108423 Martin
