Prathamesh Kulkarni <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 23:35, Richard Sandiford
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
>> > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
>> > index cd9cace3c9b..3de79060619 100644
>> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
>> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
>> > @@ -817,6 +817,62 @@ public:
>> >
>> > class svdupq_impl : public quiet<function_base>
>> > {
>> > +private:
>> > + gimple *
>> > + fold_nonconst_dupq (gimple_folder &f, unsigned factor) const
>> > + {
>> > + /* Lower lhs = svdupq (arg0, arg1, ..., argN} into:
>> > + tmp = {arg0, arg1, ..., arg<N-1>}
>> > + lhs = VEC_PERM_EXPR (tmp, tmp, {0, 1, 2, N-1, ...}) */
>> > +
>> > + /* TODO: Revisit to handle factor by padding zeros. */
>> > + if (factor > 1)
>> > + return NULL;
>>
>> Isn't the key thing here predicate vs. vector rather than factor == 1 vs.
>> factor != 1? Do we generate good code for b8, where factor should be 1?
> Hi,
> It generates the following code for svdup_n_b8:
> https://pastebin.com/ypYt590c
Hmm, yeah, not pretty :-) But it's not pretty without either.
> I suppose lowering to ctor+vec_perm_expr is not really useful
> for this case because it won't simplify ctor, unlike the above case of
> svdupq_s32 (x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3]);
> However I wonder if it's still a good idea to lower svdupq for predicates, for
> representing svdupq (or other intrinsics) using GIMPLE constructs as
> far as possible ?
It's possible, but I think we'd need an example in which its a clear
benefit.
> In the attached patch, it simply punts if the type
> suffix is b,
> and doesn't try to fold the call.
Yeah, think that's best for now.
>> > +
>> > + if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
>> > + return NULL;
>> > +
>> > + tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (f.call);
>> > + if (TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME)
>> > + return NULL;
>>
>> Why is this check needed?
> This was a left-over from something else I was doing wrongly. Sorry I
> forgot to remove it.
>>
>> > + tree lhs_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
>> > + tree elt_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs_type);
>> > + scalar_mode elt_mode = GET_MODE_INNER (TYPE_MODE (elt_type));
>>
>> Aren't we already dealing with a scalar type here? I'd have expected
>> SCALAR_TYPE_MODE rather than GET_MODE_INNER (TYPE_MODE ...).
> Ugh, sorry, I had most of the code copied over from svld1rq_impl for
> building VEC_PERM_EXPR with VLA mask and adjusted it,
> but overlooked this :/
>>
>> > + machine_mode vq_mode = aarch64_vq_mode (elt_mode).require ();
>> > + tree vq_type = build_vector_type_for_mode (elt_type, vq_mode);
>> > +
>> > + unsigned nargs = gimple_call_num_args (f.call);
>> > + vec<constructor_elt, va_gc> *v;
>> > + vec_alloc (v, nargs);
>> > + for (unsigned i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
>> > + CONSTRUCTOR_APPEND_ELT (v, NULL_TREE, gimple_call_arg (f.call, i));
>> > + tree vec = build_constructor (vq_type, v);
>> > +
>> > + tree access_type
>> > + = build_aligned_type (vq_type, TYPE_ALIGN (elt_type));
>>
>> Nit: seems to fit on one line. But do we need this? We're not accessing
>> memory, so I'd have expected vq_type to be OK as-is.
>>
>> > + tree tmp = make_ssa_name_fn (cfun, access_type, 0);
>> > + gimple *g = gimple_build_assign (tmp, vec);
>> > +
>> > + gimple_seq stmts = NULL;
>> > + gimple_seq_add_stmt_without_update (&stmts, g);
>> > +
>> > + int source_nelts = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (access_type).to_constant ();
>>
>> Looks like we should be able to use nargs instead of source_nelts.
> Does the attached patch look OK ?
>
> Thanks,
> Prathamesh
>>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
>>
>> > + poly_uint64 lhs_len = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (lhs_type);
>> > + vec_perm_builder sel (lhs_len, source_nelts, 1);
>> > + for (int i = 0; i < source_nelts; i++)
>> > + sel.quick_push (i);
>> > +
>> > + vec_perm_indices indices (sel, 1, source_nelts);
>> > + tree mask_type = build_vector_type (ssizetype, lhs_len);
>> > + tree mask = vec_perm_indices_to_tree (mask_type, indices);
>> > +
>> > + gimple *g2 = gimple_build_assign (lhs, VEC_PERM_EXPR, tmp, tmp, mask);
>> > + gimple_seq_add_stmt_without_update (&stmts, g2);
>> > + gsi_replace_with_seq (f.gsi, stmts, false);
>> > + return g2;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > public:
>> > gimple *
>> > fold (gimple_folder &f) const override
>> > @@ -832,7 +888,7 @@ public:
>> > {
>> > tree elt = gimple_call_arg (f.call, i);
>> > if (!CONSTANT_CLASS_P (elt))
>> > - return NULL;
>> > + return fold_nonconst_dupq (f, factor);
>> > builder.quick_push (elt);
>> > for (unsigned int j = 1; j < factor; ++j)
>> > builder.quick_push (build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (vec_type)));
>> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/dupq_11.c
>> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/dupq_11.c
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 00000000000..f19f8deb1e5
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/dupq_11.c
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> > +/* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
>> > +
>> > +#include <arm_sve.h>
>> > +#include <arm_neon.h>
>> > +
>> > +svint8_t f_s8(int8x16_t x)
>> > +{
>> > + return svdupq_s8 (x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3], x[4], x[5], x[6], x[7],
>> > + x[8], x[9], x[10], x[11], x[12], x[13], x[14], x[15]);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +svint16_t f_s16(int16x8_t x)
>> > +{
>> > + return svdupq_s16 (x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3], x[4], x[5], x[6], x[7]);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +svint32_t f_s32(int32x4_t x)
>> > +{
>> > + return svdupq_s32 (x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3]);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +svint64_t f_s64(int64x2_t x)
>> > +{
>> > + return svdupq_s64 (x[0], x[1]);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "VEC_PERM_EXPR" "optimized" } } */
>> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "svdupq" "optimized" } } */
>> > +
>> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tdup\tz[0-9]+\.q,
>> > z[0-9]+\.q\[0\]\n} 4 } } */
>
> [SVE] Fold svld1rq to VEC_PERM_EXPR if elements are not constant.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> (svdupq_impl::fold_nonconst_dupq): New method.
> (svdupq_impl::fold): Call fold_nonconst_dupq.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/dupq_11.c: New test.
OK for GCC 14, thanks.
Richard
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> index cd9cace3c9b..1732bf8be61 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> @@ -817,6 +817,52 @@ public:
>
> class svdupq_impl : public quiet<function_base>
> {
> +private:
> + gimple *
> + fold_nonconst_dupq (gimple_folder &f) const
> + {
> + /* Lower lhs = svdupq (arg0, arg1, ..., argN} into:
> + tmp = {arg0, arg1, ..., arg<N-1>}
> + lhs = VEC_PERM_EXPR (tmp, tmp, {0, 1, 2, N-1, ...}) */
> +
> + if (f.type_suffix (0).bool_p
> + || BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (f.call);
> + tree lhs_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
> + tree elt_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs_type);
> + scalar_mode elt_mode = SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (elt_type);
> + machine_mode vq_mode = aarch64_vq_mode (elt_mode).require ();
> + tree vq_type = build_vector_type_for_mode (elt_type, vq_mode);
> +
> + unsigned nargs = gimple_call_num_args (f.call);
> + vec<constructor_elt, va_gc> *v;
> + vec_alloc (v, nargs);
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
> + CONSTRUCTOR_APPEND_ELT (v, NULL_TREE, gimple_call_arg (f.call, i));
> + tree vec = build_constructor (vq_type, v);
> + tree tmp = make_ssa_name_fn (cfun, vq_type, 0);
> + gimple *g = gimple_build_assign (tmp, vec);
> +
> + gimple_seq stmts = NULL;
> + gimple_seq_add_stmt_without_update (&stmts, g);
> +
> + poly_uint64 lhs_len = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (lhs_type);
> + vec_perm_builder sel (lhs_len, nargs, 1);
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
> + sel.quick_push (i);
> +
> + vec_perm_indices indices (sel, 1, nargs);
> + tree mask_type = build_vector_type (ssizetype, lhs_len);
> + tree mask = vec_perm_indices_to_tree (mask_type, indices);
> +
> + gimple *g2 = gimple_build_assign (lhs, VEC_PERM_EXPR, tmp, tmp, mask);
> + gimple_seq_add_stmt_without_update (&stmts, g2);
> + gsi_replace_with_seq (f.gsi, stmts, false);
> + return g2;
> + }
> +
> public:
> gimple *
> fold (gimple_folder &f) const override
> @@ -832,7 +878,7 @@ public:
> {
> tree elt = gimple_call_arg (f.call, i);
> if (!CONSTANT_CLASS_P (elt))
> - return NULL;
> + return fold_nonconst_dupq (f);
> builder.quick_push (elt);
> for (unsigned int j = 1; j < factor; ++j)
> builder.quick_push (build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (vec_type)));
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/dupq_11.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/dupq_11.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f19f8deb1e5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/dupq_11.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +
> +#include <arm_sve.h>
> +#include <arm_neon.h>
> +
> +svint8_t f_s8(int8x16_t x)
> +{
> + return svdupq_s8 (x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3], x[4], x[5], x[6], x[7],
> + x[8], x[9], x[10], x[11], x[12], x[13], x[14], x[15]);
> +}
> +
> +svint16_t f_s16(int16x8_t x)
> +{
> + return svdupq_s16 (x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3], x[4], x[5], x[6], x[7]);
> +}
> +
> +svint32_t f_s32(int32x4_t x)
> +{
> + return svdupq_s32 (x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3]);
> +}
> +
> +svint64_t f_s64(int64x2_t x)
> +{
> + return svdupq_s64 (x[0], x[1]);
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "VEC_PERM_EXPR" "optimized" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "svdupq" "optimized" } } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tdup\tz[0-9]+\.q, z[0-9]+\.q\[0\]\n}
> 4 } } */
