Hi!

As discussed in the PR, flushing denormals to zero on every frange::set
might be harmful for e.g. x < 0.0 comparisons, because we then on both
sides use ranges that include zero [-Inf, -0.0] on the true side, and
[-0.0, +Inf] NAN on the false side, rather than [-Inf, nextafter (-0.0, -Inf)]
on the true side.

The following patch does it only in range_operator_float::fold_range
which is right now used for +-*/ (both normal and reverse ops of those).

Though, I don't see any difference on the testcase in the PR, but not sure
what I should be looking at and the reduced testcase there has undefined
behavior.

Anyway, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.

If it doesn't help with the PR, could be as well deferred for stage 1.

2023-03-28  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/109154
        * value-range.h (frange::flush_denormals_to_zero): Make it public
        rather than private.
        * value-range.cc (frange::set): Don't call flush_denormals_to_zero
        here.
        * range-op-float.cc (range_operator_float::fold_range): Call
        flush_denormals_to_zero.

--- gcc/value-range.h.jj        2023-03-23 15:25:47.059741131 +0100
+++ gcc/value-range.h   2023-03-27 18:56:35.164190929 +0200
@@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ public:
   void update_nan (tree) = delete; // Disallow silent conversion to bool.
   void update_nan (const nan_state &);
   void clear_nan ();
+  void flush_denormals_to_zero ();
 
   // fpclassify like API
   bool known_isfinite () const;
@@ -389,7 +390,6 @@ private:
   bool union_nans (const frange &);
   bool intersect_nans (const frange &);
   bool combine_zeros (const frange &, bool union_p);
-  void flush_denormals_to_zero ();
 
   tree m_type;
   REAL_VALUE_TYPE m_min;
--- gcc/value-range.cc.jj       2023-03-27 12:50:45.876826415 +0200
+++ gcc/value-range.cc  2023-03-27 18:45:50.127495492 +0200
@@ -361,8 +361,6 @@ frange::set (tree type,
 
   normalize_kind ();
 
-  flush_denormals_to_zero ();
-
   if (flag_checking)
     verify_range ();
 }
--- gcc/range-op-float.cc.jj    2023-03-27 13:28:18.847264635 +0200
+++ gcc/range-op-float.cc       2023-03-27 18:50:24.498537727 +0200
@@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ range_operator_float::fold_range (frange
        }
     }
 
+  r.flush_denormals_to_zero ();
+
   return true;
 }
 

        Jakub

Reply via email to