Because GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS was deprecated a long time ago
(see commit c6c3dba931548987c78719180e30ebc863404b89).

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/xtensa/xtensa.h (REG_OK_STRICT, REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P,
        REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P): Remove.
---
 gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
index 058602e44ee..8ebf37cab33 100644
--- a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
+++ b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
@@ -590,19 +590,10 @@ typedef struct xtensa_args
 /* C expressions that are nonzero if X (assumed to be a `reg' RTX) is
    valid for use as a base or index register.  */
 
-#ifdef REG_OK_STRICT
-#define REG_OK_STRICT_FLAG 1
-#else
-#define REG_OK_STRICT_FLAG 0
-#endif
-
 #define BASE_REG_P(X, STRICT)                                          \
-  ((!(STRICT) && REGNO (X) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)                   \
+  ((!(STRICT) && ! HARD_REGISTER_P (X))                                        
\
    || REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P (REGNO (X)))
 
-#define REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P(X) 0
-#define REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P(X) BASE_REG_P (X, REG_OK_STRICT_FLAG)
-
 /* Maximum number of registers that can appear in a valid memory address.  */
 #define MAX_REGS_PER_ADDRESS 1
 
-- 
2.30.2
  • [PATCH] xtensa: Remove REG_OK... Takayuki 'January June' Suwa via Gcc-patches

Reply via email to