I looked at this older release notes "by chance" and notice some minor editorial changes.
Pushed (but let me know if you disagree with any of these). Gerald --- htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html index 4acc8d12..915e80ae 100644 --- a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html +++ b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html @@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ You may also want to check out our <ul> <li> - Version 2.6 of the <a href="https://www.openacc.org/";>OpenACC</a> - specification is now supported in the C, C++ and Fortran compilers. + Version 2.6 of the <a href="https://www.openacc.org";>OpenACC</a> + specification is now supported by the C, C++ and Fortran compilers. See the <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/OpenACC/Implementation%20Status#status-10";>implementation status</a> section on the OpenACC wiki page and the <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-10.1.0/libgomp/#toc-Enabling-OpenACC-1";> @@ -200,11 +200,11 @@ You may also want to check out our </li> <li>GCC 10 adds a number of newly implemented <a href="https://www.openmp.org/specifications/";>OpenMP 5.0</a> - features on top of the GCC 9 release such as <code>conditional</code> + features such as <code>conditional</code> <code>lastprivate</code> clause, <code>scan</code> and <code>loop</code> directives, <code>order(concurrent)</code> and <code>use_device_addr</code> clauses support, <code>if</code> - clause on <code>simd</code> construct or partial support for + clause on <code>simd</code> construct, and partial support for the <code>declare variant</code> directive, getting closer to full support of the OpenMP 5.0 standard. </li> -- 2.39.2
