Richard Biener via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > The following fixes the condition determining whether we need an > epilogue. > > When r12-2429-g62acc72a957b56 introduced this check I didn't notice > the odd condition on review. Richard - do you remember if this > was on purpose?
Oops, no, looks like a mistake. Thanks for the fix. Richard > I've noticed the mismatch with gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-1.c for example. > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, queued for stage1. > > Richard. > > * tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc (determine_exit_conditions): Fix > no epilogue condition. > --- > gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc > index c804a7353d5..a52277abdbf 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc > +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc > @@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ determine_exit_conditions (class loop *loop, class > tree_niter_desc *desc, > /* Convert the latch count to an iteration count. */ > tree niter = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, desc->niter, > build_one_cst (type)); > - if (multiple_of_p (type, niter, bigstep)) > + if (multiple_of_p (type, niter, build_int_cst (type, factor))) > return; > }
