This fixes Jakub's second testcase. The printer needs to do slightly
different things depending on whether the gdbval obejct is a vec or a
pointer to a vec.
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/109006
* gdbhooks.py (VecPrinter): Handle vec<T> as well as vec<T>*.
---
gcc/gdbhooks.py | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gdbhooks.py b/gcc/gdbhooks.py
index 78e6c97c30d..e29bd458909 100644
--- a/gcc/gdbhooks.py
+++ b/gcc/gdbhooks.py
@@ -461,13 +461,16 @@ class VecPrinter:
return
m_vecpfx = self.gdbval['m_vecpfx']
m_num = m_vecpfx['m_num']
- typ = self.gdbval.type
+ val = self.gdbval
+ typ = val.type
if typ.code == gdb.TYPE_CODE_PTR:
typ = typ.target()
- typ = typ.template_argument(0) # the type T
- m_vecdata = (self.gdbval.address + 1).cast(typ.pointer())
+ else:
+ val = val.address
+ typ_T = typ.template_argument(0) # the type T
+ vecdata = (val + 1).cast(typ_T.pointer())
for i in range(m_num):
- yield ('[%d]' % i, m_vecdata[i])
+ yield ('[%d]' % i, vecdata[i])
######################################################################
--
2.39.2
