Hi!

The PR108503 temporary DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P clearing code can ICE
during recovery, because cp_finish_decomp when it detects errors and
reports them clears DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P, clears DECL_VALUE_EXPR and
sets TREE_TYPE of the structured binding vars to error_mark_node.
The PR108503 code had an assertion that DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P is set
so that it can clear it and restore later.

The following patch allows DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P to be unset if
type is error_mark_node and doesn't set it again in that case.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to
trunk.

2023-03-02  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/105839
        * parser.cc (cp_convert_omp_range_for): Allow in assert
        decomp_first_name without DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P if it has
        error_mark_node type.
        (cp_finish_omp_range_for): Don't set DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P back
        on decls which have error_mark_node type.

        * g++.dg/gomp/pr105839-1.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/gomp/pr105839-2.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/parser.cc.jj 2023-02-09 15:52:53.014025792 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/parser.cc    2023-03-01 12:20:59.970970342 +0100
@@ -43312,7 +43312,9 @@ cp_convert_omp_range_for (tree &this_pre
             name but the DECL_VALUE_EXPR will be dependent.  Hide those
             from folding of other loop initializers e.g. for warning
             purposes until cp_finish_omp_range_for.  */
-         gcc_checking_assert (DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (decomp_first_name));
+         gcc_checking_assert (DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (decomp_first_name)
+                              || (TREE_TYPE (decomp_first_name)
+                                  == error_mark_node));
          DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (decomp_first_name) = 0;
        }
       TREE_VEC_ELT (v, i + 3) = decomp_first_name;
@@ -43345,7 +43347,8 @@ cp_finish_omp_range_for (tree orig, tree
          tree d = decomp_first_name;
          for (unsigned i = 0; i < decomp_cnt; i++)
            {
-             DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (d) = 1;
+             if (TREE_TYPE (d) != error_mark_node)
+               DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (d) = 1;
              d = DECL_CHAIN (d);
            }
        }
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr105839-1.C.jj   2023-03-01 12:27:20.637439415 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr105839-1.C      2023-03-01 13:07:39.872273746 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// PR c++/105839
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-fopenmp" }
+
+template <typename T>
+void
+foo (const T &x)
+{
+  [&] (auto &&y)               // { dg-error "use of 'auto' in lambda 
parameter declaration only available with" "" { target c++11_only } }
+  {
+    #pragma omp parallel for
+    for (auto &&[v1, v2] : x)  // { dg-error "cannot decompose non-array 
non-class type 'const int'" }
+      ;                                // { dg-error "invalid type for 
iteration variable" "" { target c++14 } .-1 }
+                               // { dg-warning "structured bindings only 
available with" "" { target c++14_down } .-2 }
+  } ([]{});                    // { dg-error "no match for call to" "" { 
target c++11_only } }
+                               // { dg-error "invalid user-defined conversion 
from" "" { target c++11_only } .-1 }
+                               // { dg-error "invalid conversion from" "" { 
target c++11_only } .-2 }
+}
+
+void
+bar ()
+{
+  int a[10];
+  foo (a);
+}
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr105839-2.C.jj   2023-03-01 13:07:26.192472845 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr105839-2.C      2023-03-01 13:07:48.475148529 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// PR c++/105839
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-options "-fopenmp" }
+
+template <typename T>
+void
+foo (const T &x)
+{
+  [&] (auto &&y)
+  {
+    #pragma omp parallel for
+    for (auto &&[v1, v2] : x)  // { dg-warning "structured bindings only 
available with" "" { target c++14_down } }
+      ;
+  } ([]{});
+}
+
+struct A { int a, b; };
+
+void
+bar ()
+{
+  A a[10];
+  foo (a);
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to