On 2/24/23 10:32, Benson Muite via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 2/24/23 04:02, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Tobias Burnus wrote: >>> PS: I also removed a stray </code>, but admittedly only after the >>> commit. I found it by manually running those through the w3 validator >>> site. However, I did not see an automatic email, either it takes longer >>> or does it no longer run? It did in the past! >> >> You are right, and this is a sore / sad point: validator.w3.org that we >> used in the past now only supports interactive sessions. And they even >> broke support for the Referer header, so I also had to remove the checking >> link I had embedded in all of our pages. >> >> These days I invoke the validator (via a version of the original script) >> when I see a commit. Which indeed leads to many orders of magnitude longer >> delays. >> >> Sadly I don't have a better alternative. :-( >> > Could one of the following be used or used to generate a better workflow: > https://html-validate.org/usage/cli.html - written in Javascript, but > has a command line interface > https://github.com/validator/validator - packaged, but a little > cumbersome, may need a wrapper > https://github.com/w3c-validators/w3c_validators - Wrapper written in > Ruby, with a nice interface to validate a local file > html-tidy could work well. Written in C. A typical session from Git Sources following [1]:
git pull cd gcc ./configure mkdir HTML makeinfo --html --no-split -Idoc -Idoc/include -o HTML doc/gcc.texi tidy -f HTML/errs.txt -imu HTML/gcc.html Typical current reported errors are line 23080 column 22 - Warning: nested emphasis <samp> line 40445 column 11 - Warning: nested emphasis <code> line 3541 column 1 - Warning: <span> anchor "index-g_002b_002b" already defined line 54489 column 1 - Warning: <table> lacks "summary" attribute [1] https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/493013/how-to-build-the-gcc-html-documentation-from-source-into-a-single-page
