On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 06:02:40 PST (-0800), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > If we have division and remainder calculations with the same operands:
> >
> >   a = b / c;
> >   d = b % c;
> >
> > We can replace the calculation of remainder with multiplication +
> > subtraction, using the result from the previous division:
> >
> >   a = b / c;
> >   d = a * c;
> >   d = b - d;
> >
> > Which will be faster.
>
> Do you have any benchmarks that show that performance increase?  The ISA
> manual specifically says the suggested sequence is div+mod, and while
> those suggestions don't always pan out for real hardware it's likely
> that at least some implementations will end up with the ISA-suggested
> fusions.

I suspect I will be needing this kind of patch for the core that I am
going to be using.
If anything this should be under a tuning option.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


>
> > Currently, it isn't done for RISC-V.
> >
> > I've added an expander for DIVMOD which replaces 'rem' with 'mul + sub'.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Matevos.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >             * config/riscv/riscv.md: Added divmod expander.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >             * gcc.target/riscv/divmod.c: New testcase.
> >
> > --- inline copy of the patch ---
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md b/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md
> > index f95dd405e12..d941483d9f1 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md
> > @@ -148,6 +148,11 @@
> >  ;; from the same template.
> >  (define_code_iterator any_mod [mod umod])
> >
> > +;; These code iterators allow unsigned and signed divmod to be generated
> > +;; from the same template.
> > +(define_code_iterator only_div [div udiv])
> > +(define_code_attr paired_mod [(div "mod") (udiv "umod")])
> > +
> >  ;; These code iterators allow the signed and unsigned scc operations to use
> >  ;; the same template.
> >  (define_code_iterator any_gt [gt gtu])
> > @@ -175,7 +180,8 @@
> >       (gt "") (gtu "u")
> >       (ge "") (geu "u")
> >       (lt "") (ltu "u")
> > -     (le "") (leu "u")])
> > +     (le "") (leu "u")
> > +     (div "") (udiv "u")])
> >
> >  ;; <su> is like <u>, but the signed form expands to "s" rather than "".
> >  (define_code_attr su [(sign_extend "s") (zero_extend "u")])
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
> > index c8adc5af5d2..2d48ff3f8de 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
> > @@ -1044,6 +1044,22 @@
> >    [(set_attr "type" "idiv")
> >     (set_attr "mode" "DI")])
> >
> > +(define_expand "<u>divmod<mode>4"
> > +  [(parallel
> > +     [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "register_operand")
> > +           (only_div:GPR (match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand")
> > +                         (match_operand:GPR 2 "register_operand")))
> > +      (set (match_operand:GPR 3 "register_operand")
> > +           (<paired_mod>:GPR (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2)))])]
> > +  "TARGET_DIV"
> > +  {
> > +      rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (<MODE>mode);
> > +      emit_insn (gen_<u>div<GPR:mode>3 (operands[0], operands[1],
> > operands[2]));
> > +      emit_insn (gen_mul<GPR:mode>3 (tmp, operands[0], operands[2]));
> > +      emit_insn (gen_sub<GPR:mode>3 (operands[3], operands[1], tmp));
> > +      DONE;
> > +  })
> > +
> >  (define_insn "*<optab>si3_extended"
> >    [(set (match_operand:DI                 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> >   (sign_extend:DI
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/divmod.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/divmod.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..254b25e654d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/divmod.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-O1" "-Og" } } */
> > +
> > +void
> > +foo(int a, int b, int *c, int *d)
> > +{
> > +   *c = a / b;
> > +   *d = a % b;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "rem" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "mul" 1 } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "sub" 1 } } */

Reply via email to