On Fri, 16 Dec 2022, Richard Biener wrote:

> r0-89280-g129a37fc319db8 added unsharing to remap_ssa_name but
> that wasn't in the version of the patch posted.  That has some
> non-trivial cost through mostly_copy_tree_r and copy_tree_r but
> more importantly it doesn't seem to be necessary.  I've successfully
> bootstrapped and tested with an assert we only get
> tree_node_can_be_shared trees here.
> 
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with all
> languages.
> 
> Pushed to trunk.

Reverted due to PR108445, will revisit during stage1.

Richard.

>       PR middle-end/108086
>       * tree-inline.cc (remap_ssa_name): Do not unshare the
>       result from the decl_map.
> ---
>  gcc/tree-inline.cc | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-inline.cc b/gcc/tree-inline.cc
> index c802792fa07..b471774ce51 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-inline.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-inline.cc
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ remap_ssa_name (tree name, copy_body_data *id)
>         return name;
>       }
>  
> -      return unshare_expr (*n);
> +      return *n;
>      }
>  
>    if (processing_debug_stmt)
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to