On 02/12/2022 09:29, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:

When expanding a misaligned DImode move, emit aligned SImode moves if
the parts are sufficiently aligned.  This enables neighboring stores
to be peephole-combined into stm, as expected by the PR40457 testcase,
even after SLP vectorizes the originally aligned SImode stores into a
misaligned DImode store.

Regstraped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with crosses to riscv64-elf
and arm-eabi (tms570).  Ok to install?


for  gcc/ChangeLog

        PR target/40457
        * config/arm/arm.md (movmisaligndi): Prefer aligned SImode
        moves.

OK.

R.

---
  gcc/config/arm/arm.md |   12 ++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
index 69bf343fb0ed6..a9eb0299aa761 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
@@ -12783,8 +12783,16 @@ (define_expand "movmisaligndi"
    rtx hi_op0 = gen_highpart_mode (SImode, DImode, operands[0]);
    rtx hi_op1 = gen_highpart_mode (SImode, DImode, operands[1]);
- emit_insn (gen_movmisalignsi (lo_op0, lo_op1));
-  emit_insn (gen_movmisalignsi (hi_op0, hi_op1));
+  if (aligned_operand (lo_op0, SImode) && aligned_operand (lo_op1, SImode))
+    {
+      emit_move_insn (lo_op0, lo_op1);
+      emit_move_insn (hi_op0, hi_op1);
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      emit_insn (gen_movmisalignsi (lo_op0, lo_op1));
+      emit_insn (gen_movmisalignsi (hi_op0, hi_op1));
+    }
    DONE;
  })

Reply via email to