On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre <steve.mcint...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>And here's the details as promised. >> >>I've started a wiki page at >> >>https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/HardFloat/LinkerPathCallApr2012 >> >>with a strawman agenda for now, and a Doodle poll at >> >>http://www.doodle.com/93bitkqeb7auyxn7 >> >>to see when the best time is for the call on Thursday/Friday. Please >>fill in the times that work for you ASAP and I'll announce the result >>during Wednesday. Ideally we'd like stakeholders from all the relevant >>distros and the upstream toolchain developers to be there, able to >>represent their groups and (importantly) able to make a decision here >>on what we should do. >> >>Apologies for the short notice, but we need a decision quickly. > > And the best time turns out to be Friday at 15:00 UTC (16:00 BST, > 11:00 EDT etc.). Of the 10 people who responded in the poll, the only > person who can't make that time is Michael in .nz. Sorry, Michael.
All good. My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it: * is similar to /lib/ld-x86-64.so.2 * keeps the libraries and loader in the same directory * doesn't invent a new /libhf directory * is easier to implement in GLIBC * is architecture and ABI unique * requires less change for distros where the hard float libraries are already in /lib I'm happy to do the GLIBC and GCC implementation. -- Michael
