From: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (anticipatable_occurrence_p): Fix
incorrect annotations.
(available_occurrence_p): Ditto.
(backward_propagate_worthwhile_p): Ditto.
(can_backward_propagate_p): Ditto.
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
index 0c2ff630e96..72f1e4059ab 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ anticipatable_occurrence_p (const insn_info *insn, const
vector_insn_info dem)
/* The only possible operand we care of VSETVL is AVL. */
if (dem.has_avl_reg ())
{
- /* The operands shoule not be modified in the basic block prior
+ /* The operands should not be modified in the basic block prior
to the occurrence. */
if (!vlmax_avl_p (dem.get_avl ()))
{
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ available_occurrence_p (const insn_info *insn, const
vector_insn_info dem)
/* The only possible operand we care of VSETVL is AVL. */
if (dem.has_avl_reg ())
{
- /* The operands shoule not be modified in the basic block prior
+ /* The operands should not be modified in the basic block prior
to the occurrence.
e.g.
bb:
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ backward_propagate_worthwhile_p (const basic_block cfg_bb,
|_________|
reaching_out
Header is incompatible with reaching_out and the block is loop itself,
- we don't backward propagete the local_dem since we can't avoid emit
+ we don't backward propagate the local_dem since we can't avoid emit
vsetvl for the local_dem. */
edge e;
edge_iterator ei;
@@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ can_backward_propagate_p (const function_info *ssa, const
basic_block cfg_bb,
insn_info *insn = prop.get_insn ();
/* TODO: We don't backward propagate the explict VSETVL here
- since we will change vsetvl and vsetvlmax intrinsiscs into
- no side effects which can be optimized into optimzal location
- by GCC internal PASSes. We only need to support these backward
- propagation if vsetvl instrinsics have side effects. */
+ since we will change vsetvl and vsetvlmax intrinsics into
+ no side effects which can be optimized into optimal location
+ by GCC internal passes. We only need to support these backward
+ propagation if vsetvl intrinsics have side effects. */
if (vsetvl_insn_p (insn->rtl ()))
return false;
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ can_backward_propagate_p (const function_info *ssa, const
basic_block cfg_bb,
def_info *def = find_access (insn->uses (), REGNO (reg))->def ();
/* If the definition is in the current block, we can't propagate it
- acrocss blocks. */
+ across blocks. */
if (def->bb ()->cfg_bb ()->index == insn->bb ()->cfg_bb ()->index)
{
set_info *set = safe_dyn_cast<set_info *> (def);
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ can_backward_propagate_p (const function_info *ssa, const
basic_block cfg_bb,
if (def->bb ()->cfg_bb ()->index == cfg_bb->index)
return true;
- /* Make sure we don't backward propagete the VL/VTYPE info over the
+ /* Make sure we don't backward propagate the VL/VTYPE info over the
definition blocks. */
bool visited_p = false;
for (const bb_info *bb : ssa->reverse_bbs ())
--
2.36.1
