On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 01:14:39AM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 06:20:14PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > > Without or with patch #1, the below ICE in libgcc exists, the ICE should > > have > > nothing to do with the special handling for building_libgcc in patch #1. I > > think patch #2 which makes _Float128 and __float128 use the same internal > > type fixes that ICE. > > > > I still don't get the point why we need the special handling for > > building_libgcc, > > I also tested on top of patch #1 and #2 w/ and w/o the special handling for > > building_libgcc, both bootstrapped and regress-tested. > > > > Could you have a double check? > > As long as patch #2 and #3 are installed, we don't need the special handling > for building_libgcc. Good catch. > > I will send out a replacement patch for it.
Please send a complete new series replacing this one. Thanks. Segher
