On 12/12/22 12:47, David Faust wrote:


On 12/8/22 22:55, Indu Bhagat wrote:
Hi David,

On 12/7/22 12:57, David Faust wrote:
Add support for the 'extern' linkage value for BTF_KIND_VAR records,
which is used for variables declared as extern in the source file.

        PR target/106773

gcc/

        * btfout.cc (BTF_LINKAGE_STATIC): New define.
        (BTF_LINKAGE_GLOBAL): Likewise.
        (BTF_LINKAGE_EXTERN): Likewise.
        (btf_collect_datasec): Mark extern variables as such.
        (btf_asm_varent): Accomodate 'extern' linkage.

gcc/testsuite/

        * gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-4.c: New test.

include/

        * btf.h (struct btf_var): Update comment to note 'extern' linkage.
---
   gcc/btfout.cc                                 |  9 ++++++-
   .../gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-4.c        | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
   include/btf.h                                 |  2 +-
   3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-4.c

diff --git a/gcc/btfout.cc b/gcc/btfout.cc
index aef9fd70a28..a1c6266a7db 100644
--- a/gcc/btfout.cc
+++ b/gcc/btfout.cc
@@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ static char btf_info_section_label[MAX_BTF_LABEL_BYTES];
#define BTF_INVALID_TYPEID 0xFFFFFFFF +#define BTF_LINKAGE_STATIC 0
+#define BTF_LINKAGE_GLOBAL 1
+#define BTF_LINKAGE_EXTERN 2
+

I was about to suggest to rename these to use the same name as used in
the kernel btf.h. What is used there is:
          BTF_VAR_STATIC = 0,
          BTF_VAR_GLOBAL_ALLOCATED = 1,
          BTF_VAR_GLOBAL_EXTERN = 2,

But after looking at the Patch 3/3, I see you reuse these definitions
for functions as well. I just find the names confusing on the first look
- "BTF_LINKAGE_STATIC".

Naming aside, what do you think about adding the defines to
include/btf.h instead ?

Actually, I forgot these are defined (separately for both VARs and FUNCs)
in the kernel uapi/linux/btf.h. It would probably be best to mirror that
approach and use a separate enum for each, in include/btf.h. WDYT?


Yes, mirroring in include/btf.h sounds good.


   /* Mapping of CTF variables to the IDs they will be assigned when they are
      converted to BTF_KIND_VAR type records. Strictly accounts for the index
      from the start of the variable type entries, does not include the number
@@ -314,6 +318,9 @@ btf_collect_datasec (ctf_container_ref ctfc)
        continue;
const char *section_name = node->get_section ();
+      /* Mark extern variables.  */
+      if (DECL_EXTERNAL (node->decl))
+       dvd->dvd_visibility = BTF_LINKAGE_EXTERN;

This made me think about the following case.

extern const char a[];
const char a[] = "foo";

What is the expected BTF for this? Since BTF can differentiate between
the non-defining extern variable declaration, I expected to see two
variables with different "linkage". At this time I see, two variables
with global linkage but different types:

          .long   0xe000000       # btv_info
          .long   0x4     # btv_type
          .long   0x1     # btv_linkage
          .long   0x1f    # btv_name
          .long   0xe000000       # btv_info
          .long   0x7     # btv_type
          .long   0x1     # btv_linkage
          .long   0x60    # btt_name


The BTF documentation in the kernel does not clarify this case.
Going off the implementation in clang as a reference, it looks like
only one VAR record is expected, with 'global' linkage:

$ cat extdef.c
extern const char a[];
const char a[] = "foo";

$ clang -target bpf -c -g extdef.c -o extdef.o

$ /usr/sbin/bpftool btf dump file extdef.o
[1] CONST '(anon)' type_id=2
[2] INT 'char' size=1 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=8 encoding=SIGNED
[3] ARRAY '(anon)' type_id=1 index_type_id=4 nr_elems=4
[4] INT '__ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
[5] VAR 'a' type_id=3, linkage=global
[6] DATASEC '.rodata' size=0 vlen=1
        type_id=5 offset=0 size=4 (VAR 'a')

In GCC we have two records since we have two DIEs for "a" in the
DWARF. One has type "const char[4]" and the other has type
"const char[]", so the BTF records point to two different types
as well.

I guess we should find a way in BTF to identify this and
emit only the defining definition as clang does.



CTF had a similar issue earlier. See PR105089.
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR105089

         if (section_name == NULL)
        {
@@ -676,7 +683,7 @@ btf_asm_varent (ctf_dvdef_ref var)
     dw2_asm_output_data (4, var->dvd_name_offset, "btv_name");
     dw2_asm_output_data (4, BTF_TYPE_INFO (BTF_KIND_VAR, 0, 0), "btv_info");
     dw2_asm_output_data (4, get_btf_id (var->dvd_type), "btv_type");
-  dw2_asm_output_data (4, (var->dvd_visibility ? 1 : 0), "btv_linkage");
+  dw2_asm_output_data (4, var->dvd_visibility, "btv_linkage");
   }
/* Asm'out a member description following a BTF_KIND_STRUCT or
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d77600bae1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* Test BTF generation for extern variables.  */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
+
+/* Expect 4 variables.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0xe000000\[\t 
\]+\[^\n\]*btv_info" 4 } } */
+
+/* 2 extern, 1 global, 1 static.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_linkage" 1 } 
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x1\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_linkage" 1 
} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_linkage" 2 
} } */
+
+extern int a;
+extern const int b;
+int c;
+static const int d = 5;
+
+int foo (int x)
+{
+  c = a + b + x;
+
+  return c + d;
+}
diff --git a/include/btf.h b/include/btf.h
index eba67f9d599..9a757ce5bc9 100644
--- a/include/btf.h
+++ b/include/btf.h
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct btf_param
      information about the variable.  */
   struct btf_var
   {
-  uint32_t linkage;    /* Currently only 0=static or 1=global.  */
+  uint32_t linkage;    /* 0=static, 1=global, 2=extern.  */
   };
/* BTF_KIND_DATASEC is followed by VLEN struct btf_var_secinfo entries,


Reply via email to