On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:38 AM Srinath Parvathaneni via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support for Arm frame unwinding instruction "0xb5" [1]. When
> an exception is taken and "0xb5" instruction is encounter during runtime
> stack-unwinding, we use effective vsp as modifier in pointer authentication.
> On completion of stack unwinding if "0xb5" instruction is not encountered
> then CFA will be used as modifier in pointer authentication.
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/releases/download/2022Q3/ehabi32.pdf
>
> Regression tested on arm-none-eabi target and found no regressions.
>
> Ok for master?
>

No, not yet.

Presumably the logic to produce 0xb5 is in the source base and this
was tested with suitable options that produce said opcode ? I see no
logic in place to produce the said opcode in the backend in a quick
read as the pacbti patches still seem to be in review. ?

So what was the test suite run actually testing ?

regards
Ramana


> Regards,
> Srinath.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2022-11-09  Srinath Parvathaneni  <srinath.parvathan...@arm.com>
>
>         * libgcc/config/arm/pr-support.c (__gnu_unwind_execute): Decode opcode
>         "0xb5".
>
>
> ###############     Attachment also inlined for ease of reply    
> ###############
>
>
> diff --git a/libgcc/config/arm/pr-support.c b/libgcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
> index 
> e48854587c667a959aa66ccc4982231f63333ecc..73e4942a39b34a83c2da85def6b13e82ec501552
>  100644
> --- a/libgcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
> +++ b/libgcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,9 @@ __gnu_unwind_execute (_Unwind_Context * context, 
> __gnu_unwind_state * uws)
>    _uw op;
>    int set_pc;
>    int set_pac = 0;
> +  int set_pac_sp = 0;
>    _uw reg;
> +  _uw sp;
>
>    set_pc = 0;
>    for (;;)
> @@ -124,10 +126,11 @@ __gnu_unwind_execute (_Unwind_Context * context, 
> __gnu_unwind_state * uws)
>  #if defined(TARGET_HAVE_PACBTI)
>           if (set_pac)
>             {
> -             _uw sp;
>               _uw lr;
>               _uw pac;
> -             _Unwind_VRS_Get (context, _UVRSC_CORE, R_SP, _UVRSD_UINT32, 
> &sp);
> +             if (!set_pac_sp)
> +               _Unwind_VRS_Get (context, _UVRSC_CORE, R_SP, _UVRSD_UINT32,
> +                                &sp);
>               _Unwind_VRS_Get (context, _UVRSC_CORE, R_LR, _UVRSD_UINT32, 
> &lr);
>               _Unwind_VRS_Get (context, _UVRSC_PAC, R_IP,
>                                _UVRSD_UINT32, &pac);
> @@ -259,7 +262,19 @@ __gnu_unwind_execute (_Unwind_Context * context, 
> __gnu_unwind_state * uws)
>               continue;
>             }
>
> -         if ((op & 0xfc) == 0xb4)  /* Obsolete FPA.  */
> +         /* Use current VSP as modifier in PAC validation.  */
> +         if (op == 0xb5)
> +           {
> +             if (set_pac)
> +               _Unwind_VRS_Get (context, _UVRSC_CORE, R_SP, _UVRSD_UINT32,
> +                                &sp);
> +             else
> +               return _URC_FAILURE;
> +             set_pac_sp = 1;
> +             continue;
> +           }
> +
> +         if ((op & 0xfd) == 0xb6)  /* Obsolete FPA.  */
>             return _URC_FAILURE;
>
>           /* op & 0xf8 == 0xb8.  */
>
>
>

Reply via email to