From: Lili Cui <lili....@intel.com>

Hi Hontao,

This patch is to enable 256 move by pieces for ALDERLAKE and AVX2.
Bootstrap is ok, and no regressions for i386/x86-64 testsuite.

OK for master?


gcc/Changelog:

        * config/i386/x86-tune.def
        (X86_TUNE_AVX256_MOVE_BY_PIECES): Add alderlake and avx2.
        (X86_TUNE_AVX256_STORE_BY_PIECES): Ditto.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-50.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def                     |  4 ++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-50.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-50.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
index 58e29e7806a..cd66f335113 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
@@ -536,12 +536,12 @@ DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVX256_OPTIMAL, "avx256_optimal", 
m_CORE_AVX512)
 /* X86_TUNE_AVX256_MOVE_BY_PIECES: Optimize move_by_pieces with 256-bit
    AVX instructions.  */
 DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVX256_MOVE_BY_PIECES, "avx256_move_by_pieces",
-         m_CORE_AVX512)
+         m_ALDERLAKE | m_CORE_AVX2)
 
 /* X86_TUNE_AVX256_STORE_BY_PIECES: Optimize store_by_pieces with 256-bit
    AVX instructions.  */
 DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVX256_STORE_BY_PIECES, "avx256_store_by_pieces",
-         m_CORE_AVX512)
+         m_ALDERLAKE | m_CORE_AVX2)
 
 /* X86_TUNE_AVX512_MOVE_BY_PIECES: Optimize move_by_pieces with 512-bit
    AVX instructions.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-50.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-50.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c09e7c3649c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-50.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -march=alderlake" } */
+
+extern char *dst;
+
+void
+foo (int x)
+{
+  __builtin_memset (dst, x, 64);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovdqu\[ \\t\]+\[^\n\]*%ymm" 2 } } */
-- 
2.17.1

Thanks,
Lili.

Reply via email to