On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 1:43 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 01:35:35PM +0100, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > Let me see if I understand you correctly... > > > > real_isdenormal is always returning false for our uses in frange? So > > instead of using real_isdenormal in flush_denormals_to_zero, perhaps > > we should be using: > > > > REAL_EXP (r) < REAL_MODE_FORMAT (mode)->emin > > > > ?? > > > > Could we perhaps make real_isdenormal always work for all values? Is > > that possible? > > Yes. Or have real_isdenormal_target for the uses in real.cc > which would be private to real.cc and would do what real_isdenormal > currently does, and then real_isdenormal with the above definition > (well, r->cl == rvc_normal && ...).
If the REAL_EXP(r)... definition works for everyone, can't we just use that? Or do you think there'd be a measurable performance impact? Aldy
