On 24/10/2022 13:46, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:

On 24/10/2022 08:17, Richard Biener wrote:
Can you check why vect_find_stmt_data_reference doesn't trip on the

    if (TREE_CODE (DR_REF (dr)) == COMPONENT_REF
        && DECL_BIT_FIELD (TREE_OPERAND (DR_REF (dr), 1)))
      {
        free_data_ref (dr);
        return opt_result::failure_at (stmt,
                                       "not vectorized:"
                                       " statement is an unsupported"
                                       " bitfield access %G", stmt);
      }
It used to, which is why this test didn't trigger the error before my patch,
but we lower it to BIT_FIELD_REFs in ifcvt now so it is no longer a
DECL_BIT_FIELD.

But that is a red-herring, if you change the test structure's 'type Int24 is
mod 2**24;' to 'type Int24 is mod 2**32;', thus making the field we access a
normal 32-bit integer, the field no longer is a DECL_BIT_FIELD and thus my
lowering does nothing. However, you will still get the failure because the
field before it is a packed 4-bit field, making the offset to the field we are
accessing less than BITS_PER_UNIT.
Hmm, so the _intent_ of DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE is to definitely
_not_ be a DECL_BIT_FIELD (well, that's the whole point!).   So this
shows an issue with setting up DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE?  Of course
for a type with an alignment less than BITS_PER_UNIT (is StructB actually
such a type?) there cannot be a representative that isn't, so maybe
we should then set DECL_BIT_FIELD on it with a condition like Eric
mentions?
I could do this, but it would not resolve the latent issue as I could still reproduce it without using any of the bitfield lowering code, see below.

?  I think we should amend this check and I guess that
checking multiple_p on DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET should be enough?
That won't work either, unless we do the same walk-through the full access as
we do in get_inner_reference.
I suppose we should not "if-convert" bit field accesses with a
DECL_BIT_FIELD representative.  There isn't any benefit doing that
(not for general bitfield lowering either).
Changing if-convert would merely change this testcase but we could still trigger using a different structure type, changing the size of Int24 to 32 bits rather than 24:
package Loop_Optimization23_Pkg is
  type Nibble is mod 2**4;
  type Int24  is mod 2**32;  -- Changed this from 24->32
  type StructA is record
    a : Nibble;
    b : Int24;
  end record;
  pragma Pack(StructA);
  type StructB is record
    a : Nibble;
    b : StructA;
  end record;
  pragma Pack(StructB);
  type ArrayOfStructB is array(0..100) of StructB;
  procedure Foo (X : in out ArrayOfStructB);
end Loop_Optimization23_Pkg;

This would yield a DR_REF (dr): (*x_7(D))[_1].b.b  where the last 'b' isn't a DECL_BIT_FIELD anymore, but the first one still is and still has the non-multiple of BITS_PER_UNIT offset. Thus passing the vect_find_stmt_data_reference check and triggering the vect_check_gather_scatter failure. So unless we go and make sure we always set the DECL_BIT_FIELD on all subsequent accesses of a DECL_BIT_FIELD 'struct' (which is odd enough on its own) then we are better off catching the issue in vect_check_gather_scatter ?


Reply via email to