Hi Jason
> On 11 Oct 2022, at 23:06, Jason Merrill <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/22 17:58, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Tested on x86_64-darwin19, OK for master?
>> thanks
>> Iain
>> -- >8 --
>> Now we have the TARGET_EXPR_ELIDING_P flag, it is important to ensure it
>> is set properly on target exprs. The code here has a mixture of APIs used
>> to build inits. This patch changes that to use cp_build_init_expr() where
>> possible, since that handles setting the flag.
>
> Hmm, I wouldn't expect this to be necessary, since cp_build_modify_expr calls
> cp_build_init_expr for INIT_EXPR.
It seems that path is only taken if the init is a CONSTRUCTOR.
> Perhaps the similarity of the function names is a trap...
not sure exactly what trap you mean.
It seems that on my local set of additional tests (for some of the open prs)
there are some
progressions from this change, I will have to track down which change is the
cause.
thanks
Iain
>
>> ---
>> gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 25 ++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
>> index 01a3e831ee5..20d309445eb 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
>> @@ -1025,8 +1025,7 @@ build_co_await (location_t loc, tree a,
>> suspend_point_kind suspend_kind)
>> else
>> {
>> e_proxy = get_awaitable_var (suspend_kind, o_type);
>> - o = cp_build_modify_expr (loc, e_proxy, INIT_EXPR, o,
>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>> + o = cp_build_init_expr (loc, e_proxy, o);
>> }
>> /* I suppose we could check that this is contextually convertible to
>> bool. */
>> @@ -2889,8 +2888,7 @@ flatten_await_stmt (var_nest_node *n, hash_set<tree>
>> *promoted,
>> gcc_checking_assert (!already_present);
>> tree inner = TREE_OPERAND (init, 1);
>> gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (inner) != COND_EXPR);
>> - init = cp_build_modify_expr (input_location, var, INIT_EXPR, init,
>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>> + init = cp_build_init_expr (var, init);
>> /* Simplify for the case that we have an init containing the temp
>> alone. */
>> if (t == n->init && n->var == NULL_TREE)
>> @@ -3656,8 +3654,7 @@ await_statement_walker (tree *stmt, int *do_subtree,
>> void *d)
>> if (TREE_CODE (cond_inner) == CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR)
>> cond_inner = TREE_OPERAND (cond_inner, 0);
>> location_t sloc = EXPR_LOCATION (SWITCH_STMT_COND (sw_stmt));
>> - tree new_s = cp_build_init_expr (sloc, newvar,
>> - cond_inner);
>> + tree new_s = cp_build_init_expr (sloc, newvar, cond_inner);
>> finish_expr_stmt (new_s);
>> SWITCH_STMT_COND (sw_stmt) = newvar;
>> /* Now add the switch statement with the condition re-
>> @@ -4902,9 +4899,8 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree
>> *destroyer)
>> if (flag_exceptions)
>> {
>> /* This var is now live. */
>> - r = build_modify_expr (fn_start, parm.guard_var,
>> - boolean_type_node, INIT_EXPR, fn_start,
>> - boolean_true_node, boolean_type_node);
>> + r = cp_build_init_expr (fn_start, parm.guard_var,
>> + boolean_true_node);
>> finish_expr_stmt (r);
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -4948,9 +4944,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree
>> *destroyer)
>> r = coro_build_cvt_void_expr_stmt (r, fn_start);
>> finish_expr_stmt (r);
>> - r = build_modify_expr (fn_start, coro_promise_live,
>> boolean_type_node,
>> - INIT_EXPR, fn_start, boolean_true_node,
>> - boolean_type_node);
>> + r = cp_build_init_expr (fn_start, coro_promise_live,
>> boolean_true_node);
>> finish_expr_stmt (r);
>> promise_dtor
>> @@ -5031,8 +5025,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree
>> *destroyer)
>> NULL_TREE);
>> add_decl_expr (gro);
>> gro_bind_vars = gro;
>> - r = cp_build_modify_expr (input_location, gro, INIT_EXPR, get_ro,
>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>> + r = cp_build_init_expr (gro, get_ro);
>> /* The constructed object might require a cleanup. */
>> if (TYPE_HAS_NONTRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR (gro_type))
>> {
>> @@ -5053,9 +5046,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree
>> *destroyer)
>> cleanup. */
>> if (gro_ret_dtor)
>> {
>> - r = build_modify_expr (fn_start, coro_gro_live, boolean_type_node,
>> - INIT_EXPR, fn_start, boolean_true_node,
>> - boolean_type_node);
>> + r = cp_build_init_expr (fn_start, coro_gro_live, boolean_true_node);
>> finish_expr_stmt (r);
>> }
>> /* Initialize the resume_idx_var to 0, meaning "not started". */
>