Yes, please!

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 10:48 AM Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Seija,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-
> > bounces+kyrylo.tkachov=arm....@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Seija Kijin via
> > Gcc-patches
> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 2:36 PM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] arm: unified syntax for libgcc clear_cache
> >
> > The patch to convert all thumb1 code in libgcc to unified syntax
> > omitted changing all swi instructions to the current name: svc.
> >
> > This patch fixes this case.
>
> This is ok, thanks.
> Do you need someone to commit this for you?
>
> Kyrill
>
> >
> > ---
> >  libgcc/config/arm/lib1funcs.S | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libgcc/config/arm/lib1funcs.S b/libgcc/config/arm/lib1funcs.S
> > index 8c39c9f20a2b..19fa1462ccf3 100644
> > --- a/libgcc/config/arm/lib1funcs.S
> > +++ b/libgcc/config/arm/lib1funcs.S
> > @@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ LSYM(Lover12):
> >   add r7, r7, #2
> >  #endif
> >   mov r2, #0
> > - swi 0
> > + svc 0
> >   do_pop {r7}
> >   RET
> >   FUNC_END clear_cache

Reply via email to