Hi! On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:25:44PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > On 29 Sep 2022, at 18:04, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> > > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:16:33AM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: > >> Which means that we do not report an error, but a warning, and then we > >> force 64b on (taking > >> the user’s intention to be specified by the explicit ‘-m64’). > > > > And that is wrong. Any silent overriding of what the user says is bad. > > It is not silent - it warns and then carries on,
Yes, but I meant the status quo. We agree :-) > > Not overriding it (and then later ICEing) is bad as well, so it should > > be an error here. And in generic code anyway. > > As noted, if that change is made we will see what the fallout is :) Hopefully it magically makes everything fine ;-) Segher
