On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:59 PM Robin Dapp <rd...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Yes, because the native_interpret always starts at offset zero > > (we can't easily feed in a "shifted" RHS). So what I assumed is > > that IFN_LEN_STORE always stores elements [0, len + adj]. > > Hmm, but this assumption is not violated here or am I missing something? > It's not like we're storing [vec_size - (len + adj) - 1, vec_size - 1] > but indeed [0, len + adj]. Just the access to the buffer later is > reversed which it should not be.
But rhs_off is applied to the buffer "load" IIRC. At least somewhere there's an inconsistency and since rhs_off is new I bet that's where it is ...
