Hi,

Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601829.html

Kind regards,
Torbjörn

On 2022-09-19 18:30, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
After moving the testglue in commit 9d503515cee, the jump to exit and
abort is too far for the 'b' instruction on Cortex-M0. As most of the
C code would generate a 'bl' instruction instead of a 'b'
instruction, lets do the same for the inline assembler.

The error seen without this patch:

/tmp/cccCRiCl.o: in function `main':
stack-protector-1.c:(.text+0x4e): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 
against symbol `__wrap_exit' defined in .text section in gcc_tg.o
stack-protector-1.c:(.text+0x50): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 
against symbol `__wrap_abort' defined in .text section in gcc_tg.o
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

         * gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c: Use 'bl'
        instead of 'b' instruction.
        * gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c: Likewise.

Co-Authored-By: Yvan ROUX  <yvan.r...@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON  <torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>
---
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c | 4 ++--
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c
index 8d28b0a847c..3f0ffc9c3f3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-1.c
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ asm (
  "        ldr     r1, [sp, #4]\n"
        CHECK (r1)
  "        mov     r0, #0\n"
-" b       exit\n"
+" bl      exit\n"
  "1:\n"
-" b       abort\n"
+" bl      abort\n"
  "        .size   main, .-main"
  );
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c
index b8f77fa2309..2f710529b8f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-3.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ asm (
  "        .type   __stack_chk_fail, %function\n"
  "__stack_chk_fail:\n"
  "        movs    r0, #0\n"
-" b       exit\n"
+" bl      exit\n"
  "        .size   __stack_chk_fail, .-__stack_chk_fail"
  );

Reply via email to