This typo has gone unnoticed for 15 years. I had to check whether it
was supposed to say __float128 or _Float128, but based on the commit
that added it, the answer was obviously __float128.
Committed as obvious.
-- >8 --
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/extend.texi (Floating Types): Fix "_float128" typo.
---
gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index be3ea890c47..a5afb467d23 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ add, subtract, multiply, divide; unary arithmetic
operators;
relational operators; equality operators; and conversions to and from
integer and other floating types. Use a suffix @samp{w} or @samp{W}
in a literal constant of type @code{__float80} or type
-@code{__ibm128}. Use a suffix @samp{q} or @samp{Q} for @code{_float128}.
+@code{__ibm128}. Use a suffix @samp{q} or @samp{Q} for @code{__float128}.
In order to use @code{_Float128}, @code{__float128}, and @code{__ibm128}
on PowerPC Linux systems, you must use the @option{-mfloat128} option. It is
--
2.37.3
